Asset Registry: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
Matt Parnell (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Matt Parnell (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
|TBD | |TBD | ||
| | | | ||
| | |RF | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
|$490 | |$490 | ||
|The existing model is a Frigidaire (Electrolux) FGAC7044U101 (DOM: 01/2019, but not placed into service until 2021). The replacement cost is $300. Dehumidifiers tend to be short-lived (especially in high humidity, high duty cycle environments). It is estimated that this unit may only last 5 years. | |The existing model is a Frigidaire (Electrolux) FGAC7044U101 (DOM: 01/2019, but not placed into service until 2021). The replacement cost is $300. Dehumidifiers tend to be short-lived (especially in high humidity, high duty cycle environments). It is estimated that this unit may only last 5 years. | ||
|- | |-te | ||
|Fire Extinguisher | |Fire Extinguisher | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 149: | Line 149: | ||
|2018 | |2018 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Surface | |Surface (Basketball) | ||
|Unknown | |Unknown | ||
|Unknown | |Unknown | ||
| Line 155: | Line 155: | ||
|style="background:#FFC7CE|None | |style="background:#FFC7CE|None | ||
| | | | ||
|$ | |$38,000 | ||
| | |||
| | |||
|There are essentially four options given the court conditions: | |||
# Fill cracks with acrylic crack filler, then resurface and paint for about $20,000. Based on just short of 900 ft of cracks at 2020 pricing. This is a very short-term solution; assume cracks will re-appear after a large day/night temperature swing (and especially after a freeze/thaw). For that reason, this repair is not recommended. | |||
# The same as the prior option, plus fabric overlay crack repair (2-year guarantee) for about $33,000. This solution should last 4-5 years (after which cracks may re-appear). This may be the best solution for the near term. For this option, the sport coating contractor may be hired directly. | |||
# Grind down 2 inches of the surface, then re-build for about $100,000 ($50,000 per court). For this option, hire a paving contractor; the sport coating is sub-contracted. | |||
# Demolish entirely, add improved drainage, then re-build for about $150,000 ($75,000 per court). This is by far the most expensive, but the most effective solution depending upon the underlying issues (i.e. very wet grounds). For this option, hire a paving contractor; the sport coating is sub-contracted. | |||
Given present budgets, it seems likely that option #2 is the best choice for the 5-10 year window. The lifespan of 5 years assumes repeated use of option #2. | |||
|- | |||
|Surface (Tennis) | |||
|Unknown | |||
|Unknown | |||
|5 | |||
|style="background:#FFC7CE|None | |||
| | | | ||
|$42,000 | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|There are essentially four options given the court conditions: | |||
# Fill cracks with acrylic crack filler, then resurface and paint per USTA standards for about $23,000. Based on just short of 1000 ft of cracks at 2020 pricing. This is a very short-term solution; assume cracks will re-appear after a large day/night temperature swing (and especially after a freeze/thaw). For that reason, this repair is not recommended. | |||
# The same as the prior option, plus fabric overlay crack repair (2-year guarantee) for about $37,000. This solution should last 4-5 years (after which cracks may re-appear). This may be the best solution for the near term. For this option, the sport coating contractor may be hired directly. | |||
# Grind down 2 inches of the surface, then re-build for about $100,000 ($50,000 per court). For this option, hire a paving contractor; the sport coating is sub-contracted. | |||
# Demolish entirely, add improved drainage, then re-build for about $150,000 ($75,000 per court). This is by far the most expensive, but the most effective solution depending upon the underlying issues (i.e. very wet grounds). For this option, hire a paving contractor; the sport coating is sub-contracted. | |||
Given present budgets, it seems likely that option #2 is the best choice for the 5-10 year window. The lifespan of 5 years assumes repeated use of option #2. | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Tennis Nets | |Tennis Nets | ||