Asset Registry: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The Asset Registry is maintained by Building & Grounds and reviewed by the board as a whole.  The original version was created by Sally Duffy and the 2020 Capital Assessment Committee.
The Asset Registry is maintained by Building & Grounds and reviewed by the board.  The original version was created by Sally Duffy and the 2020 Capital Assessment Committee.


<b>Last Updated:</b> January 26th, 2023
<b>Last Updated:</b> February 8th, 2023


Where possible, inflation is considered (using [https://smartasset.com/investing/inflation-calculator this calculator], for instance).  Future investment is a "best guess" based upon past quotes or work, where possible.  NOTE: A higher-than-expected inflation rate took effect in 2022.  This has not necessarily been factored into calculations at this time (August 2022).  Many estimates were made in 2020 and 2021.
Where possible, inflation is considered (using [https://smartasset.com/investing/inflation-calculator this calculator], for instance).  Future investment is a "best guess" based upon past quotes or work, where possible.  NOTE: A higher-than-expected inflation rate took effect in 2022.  This has not necessarily been factored into calculations (August 2022).  Many estimates were made in 2020 and 2021.


Columns for <b>Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA)</b> were added in January 2023.  The columns are as follows:
Columns for <b>Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA)</b> were added in January 2023.  The columns are as follows:
Line 340: Line 340:
# Powerwash to clean.  Fill cracks with acrylic crack filler, then resurface and paint for about $20,000.  Based on just short of 900 ft of cracks at 2020 pricing.  This is a very short-term solution; assume cracks will re-appear after a large day/night temperature swing (and especially after a freeze/thaw).  For that reason, this repair is not recommended.
# Powerwash to clean.  Fill cracks with acrylic crack filler, then resurface and paint for about $20,000.  Based on just short of 900 ft of cracks at 2020 pricing.  This is a very short-term solution; assume cracks will re-appear after a large day/night temperature swing (and especially after a freeze/thaw).  For that reason, this repair is not recommended.
# The same as the prior option, plus fabric overlay crack repair (2-year guarantee) for about $33,000.  This solution should last 4-5 years (after which cracks may re-appear).  This may be the best solution for the near term.  For this option, the sport coating contractor may be hired directly.
# The same as the prior option, plus fabric overlay crack repair (2-year guarantee) for about $33,000.  This solution should last 4-5 years (after which cracks may re-appear).  This may be the best solution for the near term.  For this option, the sport coating contractor may be hired directly.
# Grind down 2 inches of the surface, then re-build for about $100,000 ($50,000 per court).  For this option, hire a paving contractor; the sport coating is sub-contracted.
# Grind down 2 inches of the surface, then re-build for about $100,000 ($50,000 per court).  For this option, hire a paving contractor; the sport coating is subcontracted.
# Demolish entirely, add improved drainage, then re-build for about $150,000 ($75,000 per court).  This is by far the most expensive, but the most effective solution depending upon the underlying issues (i.e. very wet grounds).  For this option, hire a paving contractor; the sport coating is sub-contracted.
# Demolish, add improved drainage, then rebuild for about $150,000 ($75,000 per court).  This is by far the most expensive, but the most effective solution depending upon the underlying issues (i.e. very wet grounds).  For this option, hire a paving contractor; the sport coating is subcontracted.
Given present budgets, it seems likely that option #2 is the best choice for the 5-10 year window.  The lifespan of 5 years assumes repeated use of option #2.
Given current budgets, it seems likely that option #2 is the best choice for the 5-10 year window.  The lifespan of 5 years assumes repeated use of option #2.
|-
|-
|Surface (Tennis)
|Surface (Tennis)

Navigation menu